
An extrasolar planet, or exoplanet, is a planet beyond the Solar System, orbiting around another star. As of November 2008, 322 exoplanets have been detected and confirmed.[1] The vast majority were detected through various indirect methods rather than actual imaging.[1] Most of them are massive giant planets thought to resemble Jupiter, though this is likely to be due to limitations in detection technology. More recent unconfirmed detections suggest that much smaller worlds may be considerably more common than previous figures have suggested.[2]
Extrasolar planets became a subject of scientific investigation in the mid-19th century. Astronomers generally supposed that some existed, but it was not known how common they were and how similar they were to the planets of the Solar System. The first confirmed detections were made in the 1990s; since 2000, more than 15 have been discovered every year. The frequency of detection is increasing with 61 planets detected in 2007. It is estimated that at least 10% of sun-like stars have planets, and the true proportion may be much higher.[3] The discovery of extrasolar planets sharpens the question of whether some might support extraterrestrial life.[4]
Currently, Gliese 581 d, the third planet of the red dwarf star Gliese 581 (approximately 20 light years from Earth), appears to be the best example yet discovered of a possible terrestrial exoplanet which orbits close to the habitable zone of space surrounding its star. Going by strict terms, it appears to reside outside the "Goldilocks Zone", but the greenhouse effect may raise the planet's surface temperature to that which would support liquid water.
Contents |
Unconfirmed until 1988, extrasolar planets have long been assumed as plausible, and speculation on planets circling around the fixed stars dates to at least the early 18th century, with Isaac Newton's General Scholium (1713), which has "And if the fixed Stars are the centers of other like systems, these, being form'd by the like wise counsel, must be all subject to the dominion of One" (trans. Motte 1729).
Claims about detection of exoplanets have been made from the 19th century. Some of the earliest involve the binary star 70 Ophiuchi. In 1855, Capt. W. S. Jacob at the East India Company's Madras Observatory reported that orbital anomalies made it "highly probable" that there was a "planetary body" in this system.[5] In the 1890s, Thomas J. J. See of the University of Chicago and the United States Naval Observatory stated that the orbital anomalies proved the existence of a dark body in the 70 Ophiuchi system with a 36-year period around one of the stars.[6] However, Forest Ray Moulton soon published a paper proving that a three-body system with those orbital parameters would be highly unstable.[7] During the 1950s and 1960s, Peter van de Kamp of Swarthmore College made another prominent series of detection claims, this time for planets orbiting Barnard's Star.[8] Astronomers now generally regard all the early reports of detection as erroneous.
In 1991, Andrew Lyne, M. Bailes and S.L. Shemar claimed to have discovered a pulsar planet in orbit around PSR 1829-10, using pulsar timing variations.[9] The claim briefly received intense attention, but Lyne and his team soon retracted it.[10]
The first published discovery to have received subsequent confirmation was made in 1988 by the Canadian astronomers Bruce Campbell, G. A. H. Walker, and S. Yang.[11] Their radial-velocity observations suggested that a planet orbited the star Gamma Cephei. They remained cautious about claiming a true planetary detection, and widespread skepticism persisted in the astronomical community for several years about this and other similar observations. It was mainly because the observations were at the very limits of instrumental capabilities at the time. Another source of confusion was that some of the possible planets might instead have been brown dwarfs, objects that are intermediate in mass between planets and stars.
The following year, additional observations were published that supported the reality of the planet orbiting Gamma Cephei,[12] though subsequent work in 1992 raised serious doubts.[13] Finally, in 2003, improved techniques allowed the planet's existence to be confirmed.[14]
In early 1992, radio astronomers Aleksander Wolszczan and Dale Frail announced the discovery of planets around another pulsar, PSR 1257+12.[15] This discovery was quickly confirmed, and is generally considered to be the first definitive detection of exoplanets. These pulsar planets are believed to have formed from the unusual remnants of the supernova that produced the pulsar, in a second round of planet formation, or else to be the remaining rocky cores of gas giants that survived the supernova and then spiraled into their current orbits.
On October 6, 1995, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz of the University of Geneva announced the first definitive detection of an exoplanet orbiting an ordinary main-sequence star (51 Pegasi).[16] This discovery was made at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence and ushered in the modern era of exoplanetary discovery. Technological advances, most notably in high-resolution spectroscopy, led to the detection of many new exoplanets at a rapid rate. These advances allowed astronomers to detect exoplanets indirectly by measuring their gravitational influence on the motion of their parent stars. Several extrasolar planets were eventually also detected by observing the variation in a star's apparent luminosity as a planet passed in front of it.
To date, 322 exoplanets have been found,[1] including a few that were confirmations of controversial claims from the late 1980s. The first system to have more than one planet detected was υ And. Twenty such multiple-planet systems are now known. Among the known exoplanets are four pulsar planets orbiting two separate pulsars. Infrared observations of circumstellar dust disks also suggest the existence of millions of comets in several extrasolar systems.
Planets are extremely faint light sources compared to their parent stars. At visible wavelengths, they usually have less than a millionth of their parent star's brightness. In addition to the intrinsic difficulty of detecting such a faint light source, the parent star causes a glare that washes it out.
For those reasons, current telescopes can only directly image exoplanets under exceptional circumstances. Specifically, it may be possible when the planet is especially large (considerably larger than Jupiter), widely separated from its parent star, and hot so that it emits intense infrared radiation.
The vast majority of known extrasolar planets have been discovered through indirect methods:
Not counting a few exceptions, all known extrasolar planet candidates have been found using ground-based telescopes. However, many of the methods can yield better results if the observing telescope is located above the restless atmosphere. COROT (launched in December 2006) is the only active space mission dedicated to extrasolar planet search. Hubble Space Telescope has also found or confirmed a few planets. There are many planned or proposed space missions such as Kepler, New Worlds Mission, Darwin, Space Interferometry Mission, Terrestrial Planet Finder, and PEGASE.
The most common way of naming extrasolar planets is almost similar to the naming of binary stars, except a lowercase letter is used for the planet (while an uppercase letter is for stars). A lowercase letter is placed after the star name, starting with "b" for the first planet found in the system (51 Pegasi b). The next planet found in the system could be labeled the next letter in the alphabet. For instance, any more planets found around 51 Pegasi would be catalogued as "51 Pegasi c" and then "51 Pegasi d", and so on. If two planets are discovered around the same time, the closest one to the star gets the next letter, while the last planet would get the last letter. For example, in the Gliese 876 system, the most recently discovered planet is referred to as Gliese 876 d, despite the fact that it is closer to the star than Gliese 876 b and Gliese 876 c. The suffix "a" was intended to refer specifically to the primary, as opposed to the system as a whole, but this did not catch on.[citation needed] The planet 55 Cancri f is currently the first and only planet to have "f" in its name (being the fifth planet found in the 55 Cancri system), with no letters currently beyond "f" (the highest letter currently in use).
Only two planetary systems have planets that are named "unusual". Before the discovery of 51 Pegasi b in 1995, two pulsar planets (PSR B1257+12 B and PSR B1257+12 C) were discovered from pulsar timing of their dead star. Being that there was no official way of naming planets at the time, they were called "B" and "C" (similar to how planets are named today). However, uppercase letters were used, most likely because of the way binary stars were named. When a third planet was discovered, it was designated PSR B1257+12 A (simply because the planet was closer than the other two).[18] Some nomenclatures (generally in science fiction) use Roman numerals in the order of planets' positions from the star, but for the above reason, this is not practical.
If the planet orbits in a non-circumbinary system, the letter of the star is added to the name. If the planet orbits the primary star of the system, and the secondary stars were either discovered after the planet or are relatively far form the primary star and planet, the name is usually omitted. For example, Tau Boötis b orbits in a binary system, but because the secondary star was both discovered after the planet and very far from the primary star and planet, the term "Tau Boötis Ab" is rarely to never used. However (in the cases of 16 Cygni Bb and 83 Leonis Bb), if the planet orbits a secondary star of the system, the star's name is always used. Some planets have received unofficial (informal) names that can be compared to the planets of the Solar system. The most noted planets that have been given names include: Osiris (HD 209458 b), Bellerophon (51 Pegasi b), and Methuselah (PSR B1620-26 b). The International Astronomical Union (IAU) currently has no plans to officially name extrasolar planets, considering it impractical,[19] but the idea may work if only a few planets get officially named (similar to how only a few stars have traditional names and always use it).[clarify]
According to the International Astronomical Union's working definition of "planet," a planet must orbit a star.[20] However, the current IAU definition for planet only accounts for our own solar system and all extrasolar planets were excluded from this definition for now.[21] The "working" definition for extrasolar planets was established in 2001 (and last modified in 2003) with the following criteria:
| “ |
|
” |
There have also been reports of free-floating planetary-mass objects (ones not orbiting any star), sometimes called "rogue planets" or "interstellar planets". Such objects are not discussed in this article since they are outside the working definition of "planet".
Most known exoplanets orbit stars roughly similar to our own Sun, that is, main-sequence stars of spectral categories F, G, or K. One reason is simply that planet search programs have tended to concentrate on such stars. But even after taking this into account, statistical analysis suggests that lower-mass stars (red dwarfs, of spectral category M) are either less likely to have planets or have planets that are themselves of lower mass and hence harder to detect.[22] Recent observations by the Spitzer Space Telescope indicate that stars of spectral category O, which are much hotter than our Sun, produce a photo-evaporation effect that inhibits planetary formation.[23]
Stars are composed mainly of the light elements hydrogen and helium. They also contain a small fraction of heavier elements such as iron, and this fraction is referred to as a star's metallicity. Stars of higher metallicity are much more likely to have planets, and the planets they have tend to be more massive than those of lower-metallicity stars.[3]
In careful spectroscopic observations it is found that rotational velocity drops off abruptly after spectral class F2 stars. It should be noted that the Sun is a G2 Class star (which is, after F2.) Ninety eight percent of the angular momentum of the solar system derives from the orbital motions of the planets. In an isolated system, angular momentum must be conserved, so, of course, the remaining 2 percent lies with the sun. Therefore it seems that the angular momentum of the Sun has been transferred to the planets, that would otherwise cause the Sun to rotate 50 times faster than it currently does (approximately 2 km/s.) If this hypothesis is correct, slowly rotating stars are so because a large portion of their angular momentum has been transferred elsewhere, perhaps to orbiting planets. Since ninety three percent of all main sequence stars are later than F2, it would seem that the bulk of stars in the galaxy may have planets, unless alternative methods of angular momentum transfer are proven likely.
Most known extrasolar planet candidates have been discovered using indirect methods and therefore only certain physical and orbital parameters can be determined. The radial velocity method provides all orbital elements except for inclination, including orbital period, semi-major axis, Orbital eccentricity, angular distance, longitude of periastron, time of periastron, and semi-amplitude. The unknown inclination results in unknown mass and therefore usually only the minimum mass is given. In some cases it may be a much more massive object such as brown dwarf or red dwarf star instead. However, if the planet's orbit is nearly perpendicular to sky (inclination close to 90°), the planet can be seen transiting its star and therefore its true mass and radius can be measured. Furthermore, astrometric observations and dynamical studies in multiple planet systems can be used to constrain the mass of a planet.
Spectroscopic measurements during the transit can be used to study a transiting planet's atmospheric composition.[24] Secondary transit (occurs when the planet is behind the star) can be used for direct detection of infrared radiation from the planet. In addition, infrared observations can be used to study heat patterns on the surface of a closely-orbiting planet.
The vast majority of exoplanets found so far have high masses. As of August 2008, all but twelve of them have more than ten times the mass of Earth.[1] Many are considerably more massive than Jupiter, the most massive planet in the Solar System. However, these high masses are in large part due to an observational selection effect: all detection methods are much more likely to discover massive planets. This bias makes statistical analysis difficult, but it appears that lower-mass planets are actually more common than higher-mass ones, at least within a broad mass range that includes all giant planets. In addition, the fact that astronomers have found several planets only a few times more massive than Earth, despite the great difficulty of detecting them, indicates that such planets are fairly common.[3] According to 2008 data from the Harps (High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher) spectrograph instrument in Chile, about one star in 14 may have gas giant planets, while one in three probably has rocky planets of below 30 Earth masses.[25]
Many exoplanets orbit much closer around their parent star than any planet in our own Solar System orbits around the Sun. Again, that is mainly an observational selection effect. The radial-velocity method is most sensitive to planets with such small orbits. Astronomers were initially very surprised by these "hot Jupiters," but it is now clear that most exoplanets (or at least, most high-mass exoplanets) have much larger orbits, some located in habitable zones where suitable for liquid water and life. It appears plausible that in most exoplanetary systems, there are one or two giant planets with orbits comparable in size to those of Jupiter and Saturn in our own Solar System.
The eccentricity of an orbit is a measure of how elliptical (elongated) it is. Most known exoplanets have quite eccentric orbits. This is not an observational selection effect, since a planet can be detected about a star equally well regardless of the eccentricity of its orbit. The prevalence of elliptical orbits is a major puzzle, since current theories of planetary formation strongly suggest planets should form with circular (that is, non-eccentric) orbits. One possible theory is that small companions such as T dwarfs (methane-bearing brown dwarfs) can hide in such solar systems and can cause the orbits of planets to be extreme.[26] This is also an indication that our own Solar System may be unusual, since all of its planets except for Mercury do follow basically circular orbits.[3]
Many unanswered questions remain about the properties of exoplanets, such as the details of their composition and the likelihood of possessing moons. The recent discovery that several surveyed exoplanets lacked water showed that there is still much more to be learned about the properties of exoplanets. Another question is whether they might support life. Several planets do have orbits in their parent star's habitable zone, where it should be possible for Earth-like conditions to prevail. Most of those planets are giant planets more similar to Jupiter than to Earth; if these planets have large moons, the moons might be a more plausible abode of life. Detection of life (other than an advanced civilization) at interstellar distances, however, is a tremendously challenging technical task that will not be feasible for many years, even if such life is commonplace.
The first milestone in the discovery of extrasolar planets was in 1992, when Wolszczan and Frail published results in the journal Nature indicating that pulsar planets existed around PSR B1257+12.[15] Wolszczan had discovered the millisecond pulsar in question in 1990 at the Arecibo radio observatory. These were the first exoplanets ever verified, and they are still considered highly unusual in that they orbit a pulsar.
The first verified discovery of an exoplanet (51 Pegasi b) orbiting a main sequence star (51 Pegasi) was announced by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz in Nature on October 6, 1995.[16] Astronomers were initially surprised by this "hot Jupiter" but soon set out to find other similar planets with great success.
Since that time, other notable discoveries have included:
| Title | Planet | Star | Year | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First planet discovered. | PSR B1257+12 B PSR B1257+12 C |
PSR B1257+12 | 1992 | First extrasolar planets discovered
|
| First discovery by a method | ||||
| First planet discovered via pulsar timing. | PSR B1257+12 B PSR B1257+12 C |
PSR B1257+12 | 1992 | |
| First planet discovered via radial velocity. | 51 Pegasi b | 51 Pegasi | 1995 | |
| First planet discovered via transit. | OGLE-TR-56 b | OGLE-TR-56 | 2002 |
|
| First planet discovered via gravitational lensing. | OGLE-2003-BLG-235L b | OGLE-2003-BLG-235L/MOA-2003-BLG-53L | 2004 | |
| First discovery by system type | ||||
| First planet discovered in a solitary star system. | PSR B1257+12 B PSR B1257+12 C |
PSR B1257+12 | 1992 | First extrasolar planets discovered
|
| First "free-floating" planet discovered. | S Ori J053810.1-023626 (S Ori 70) |
2004 | Has mass of 3 MJupiter, needs confirmation.
|
|
| First planet discovered in a multiple star system. | 55 Cancri b | 55 Cancri | 1996 | 55 Cnc has distant red dwarf companion.
|
| First planet discovered in a circumbinary orbit. | PSR B1620-26 b | PSR B1620-26 | 1993 | Orbits a pulsar and a white dwarf. |
| First multiple planet system discovered. | PSR B1257+12 A PSR B1257+12 B PSR B1257+12 C |
PSR B1257+12 | 1992 | A pulsar planetary system. |
| First planet in star cluster. | PSR B1620-26 b | PSR B1620-26 | 1993 | Located in Messier 4 |
| First discovery by star type | ||||
| First pulsar planet discovered. | PSR B1257+12 B PSR B1257+12 C |
PSR B1257+12 | 1992 | |
| First known planet orbiting a main sequence star (Sun-like) | 51 Pegasi b | 51 Pegasi | 1995 | |
| First known planet orbiting a red dwarf | Gliese 876 b | Gliese 876 | 1998 | |
| First known planet orbiting a giant star | Iota Draconis b | Iota Draconis | 2002 |
|
| First known planet orbiting a white dwarf. | PSR B1620-26 b | PSR B1620-26 | 1993 |
|
| First known planet orbiting a brown dwarf. | 2M1207 b | 2M1207 | 2004 | First directly imaged planet. |
| First "free-floating" planet discovered. | S Ori J053810.1-023626 (S Ori 70) |
2004 | Has mass of 3 MJupiter, needs confirmation.
|
|
| Firsts by planet type | ||||
| First cool (possibly rocky/icy) planet around main-sequence star. | OGLE-2005-BLG-390L b | OGLE-2005-BLG-390L | 2006 | |
| Other firsts | ||||
| First transiting planet. | HD 209458b | HD 209458 | 1999 |
|
| First directly imaged planet. | 2M1207 b | 2M1207 | 2004 | First planet found around brown dwarf |
| First imaged planet orbiting a 'normal' star | ?? | 1RXS J160929.1-210524 | 2008 | First planet orbiting a Sun-like star[54] |